|
Mistake Number One: Exiting By: Charles Payne, CEO & Principal Analyst
Without a doubt, exiting a stock is the most difficult part of the investment cycle. It is very easy to buy a stock. Ironically, this is where the exiting problem begins. Once I did an interview on television and the commentator asked me and the rest of the panel if using stop losses was a good idea. Everyone said yes, but I added a twist saying using stops should be determined based on why you're in the position in the first place. Here is where I was going.
If you buy a stock simply because the stock was touted on TV, the Internet, or in a newspaper, then you are piggybacking on someone else's conviction. If you buy a stock because of a chart pattern, you are making assumptions based on past precedents (like a stock climbing through a double top or bouncing off a reverse head and shoulders formation) and future assumptions that have nothing to do with fundamentals. We think there is a valid place for charts, but to use them as the prime source of long term investing decisions will eventually result in anguish.
So you own XYZ Semiconductor at $43.00 a share and the broad market is lower because North Korea lobs a wobble missile into the Sea of Japan and threatens to do further testing firings, too. XYZ Semiconductor stumbles to $40.00 a share…now what? Well some people believe in using automatic stop losses. Experts often suggest these stops be anywhere from 5% to 10% of the current share price and adjusted once the stock moves higher (also known as a trailing stop).
Our theory on stops is that it should be used only if you're a trader; you buy stocks and take short term gains typically in one to thirty days. The reason we think you have to use stops with this approach is because since you are limiting your upside, you must limit your downside, too. That said, however, if you are an investor then you have to be able to weather the periodic downside moves without limiting your profits or taking unnecessary losses.
If XYZ Semiconductor recently posted its earnings results and relayed the following developments, it would not only be a hold, but probably a buy on weakness as well:
- Organic top line revenue came in above company and Wall Street consensus
- Spending was contained without sacrificing research and development
- The effective tax rate held at the same level or was lower
- The Company is taking market share from rivals
- Management touts its product pipeline
- The Company raises its guidance above consensus estimates
Of course if you owned this stock from a tout, then you more than likely would have sold. If you were using a trailing stop, then more than likely you would have sold. If you were listening to the doom and gloom on television, then more than likely you would have sold.
If you would have sold XYZ Semiconductor, more than likely you would live to regret it.
Real Life Case Study
Crocs (CROX)
Top line revenue growth coupled with improving margins (measured on a year to year basis) should have given a person confidence to be an investor in Crocs. Look at the operating margin trend higher over time and surge on a year to year basis each quarter.
Stopping out and missing Out on Big Money
On the way up there would have been many instances where investors employing automatic stop losses would have been shaken out of CROX. Forget 5 to 10% stops most people would have been shaken out of this stock several times on the way up if they only relied on share price to convey whether a stock was a good or bad investment. Ignoring or not knowing the fundamentals expressed in the table above would have meant a lack of confidence in the stock. Here are the periods when it was vital to believe in management's ability to execute.
- On May 5, 2006, the stock hit high of $18.50 only to stumble to $10.78 by June 6, 2006 for a decline of 71.6%.
- On August 4, 2006, the share price reached a high of $15.37 then proceeded to pullback to $12.36 for a decline of 24.36%.
- On November 17, 2006, the share prices rallied to $25.12 then slid to $20.44 or a 22.90%.
- On February 9, 2007, the shares spiked to $29.28 a share and then fell to $21.67 for a 35.12% decline.
- On June 22, 2007, the stock hit $47.41 and was subsequently sacked to $40.38 by June 29 for a quick 17.38% decline.
Here are the five times when most investors would have bit the bullet simply based on the actions of the crowd.
Next Mistake: Cheap Stocks
|
|
 |
3 Mistakes that are killing your portfolio
How WStreet Can Help
Now more than ever knowing what's under the hood matters. Get your free copy of Charles Payne's Money Show University presentation
"Getting the Market Right by Shedding Horrible Habits". This is a 61 page education piece. Plus a free copy of
"Shaken Not Stirred", a case study of the APPL stock's amazing fall and rise.
Send us your contact information, tell us a little about yourself and we take care of the rest.
|
|
|